A framework for heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications

Heuristic evaluation is a fast and cheap method that can be used to identify usability flaws in mobile learning applications. In this paper, we proposed a framework for heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications to ensure that best practices are followed, hence saving time and effort in conducting a heuristic evaluation. Ten case studies on heuristic evaluation of mobile learning applications were selected, and an analysis was conducted to identify the best practices that were later incorporated into a framework. The framework was utilized to conduct heuristic evaluation to show the feasibility of our approach. The results indicate that it provides clear guidance, and it’s fast and easy to conduct heuristic evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications

Heuristic Evaluation for Mobile Applications: Extending a Map of the Literature

Heuristic Evaluation of Mobile Usability: A Mapping Study

Explore related subjects

• Artificial Intelligence
• Digital Education and Educational Technology

References

• Ali, A., Alrasheedi, M., Ouda, A., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). A study of the interface usability issues of mobile learning applications for smart phones from the users perspective. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1501.01875,
• Aliaño, Á. M., Hueros, A. D., Franco, M. G., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Mobile learning in university contexts based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 8(1), 7–17. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 885–909. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Benyon, D. (2014). Designing interactive systems: A comprehensive guide to HCI, UX and interaction design, Pearson.
• Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2005). Designing interactive systems: People, activities, contexts, technologies, Pearson Education.
• Chung, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Lai, C. L. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010-2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1–13. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Crompton, H., & Traxler, J. (2019). Learning with mobile devices. In Advanced methodologies and Technologies in Modern Education Delivery (pp. 793-808). IGI Global.
• Dimakopoulos, D. N., & Magoulas, G. D. (2009). Interface design and evaluation of a personal information space for mobile learners. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 3(4), 440–463. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Fatahi, S. (2019). An experimental study on an adaptive e-learning environment based on learner's personality and emotion. Education and Information Technologies, 1-17.
• Fatahi, S., & Moradian, S. (2018). An empirical study on the impact of using an adaptive e-learning environment based on Learner's personality and emotion. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
• Fetaji, M., & Fetaji, B. (2011). Comparing developed MLUAT (mobile learning usability attribute testing) methodology with qualitative user testing method and heuristics evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, 516–523.
• Gray, W. D., & Salzman, M. C. (1998). Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(3), 203–261. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Gu, X., Gu, F., & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204–215. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Hashim, A. S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Ahmad, R. (2011). Mobile learning course content application as a revision tool: The effectiveness and usability. Paper presented at the 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligence Robotics, 2 184–187.
• Jamaldeen, F., Hewagamage, P., & Ekanayaka, Y. (2018). Design guidelines for creating mobile language learning applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 12(3), 52–74. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, B. A., & Goundar, M. S. (2019). Usability heuristics for mobile learning applications. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1819–1833. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, B. A., & Hussein, S. (2014). Heuristic based user interface evaluation of mobile money application: A case study. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research (IJHCR), 5(2), 75–86. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2016). Usability guideline for mobile learning apps: An empirical study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(4), 223–237. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, B. A., & Mohite, P. (2018). Usability of mobile learning applications: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 1–17. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, B. A., & Sharma, B. (2019). Context aware mobile learning application development: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19.
• Kumar, B. A., Goundar, M. S., & Chand, S. S. (2019). Usability guideline for Mobile learning applications: An update. Education and Information Technologies, 1–17.
• Masood, M., & Thigambaram, M. (2015). The usability of mobile applications for pre-schoolers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1818–1826. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994a). Usability engineering Elsevier. Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994b). Usability inspection methods. Paper presented at the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 413-414.
• Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group, 1(1).
• Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 249-256.
• Omar, H. M., & Jaafar, A. (2010). Heuristics evaluation in computer games. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Management: Exploring the Invisible World, CAMP'10,
• Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J. A., & Humburg, J. (2000). A toolkit for strategic usability: Results from workshops, panels, and surveys. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 337-344.
• Sánchez, J., Salinas, A., & Sáenz, M. (2007). Mobile game-based methodology for science learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 322–331.
• Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., & Marsden, G. (2013). Designing mobile LMS interfaces: Learners' expectations and experiences. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 10(2), 147–167. ArticleGoogle Scholar
• Wahab, N. A., Osman, A., & Ismail, M. H. (2010). Engaging children to science subject: A heuristic evaluation of mobile learning prototype. Paper presented at the 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, 2 513–516.
• Wilson, C. (2013). User interface inspection methods: A user-centered design method Newnes.
• Wilson, C. (2014). User interface inspection methods Science Direct.
• Zaibon, S. B., & Shiratuddin, N. (2010). Heuristics evaluation strategy for mobile game-based learning. Paper presented at the 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education, 127–131.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji Bimal Aklesh Kumar, Munil Shiva Goundar & Sailesh Saras Chand

1. Bimal Aklesh Kumar